Guest Blog Post: The Political Pistachio
Posted by Team Walsh - Tue, February 02, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Dana Walsh is an independent businesswoman who wants to serve her country. The entrenched political elite in Washington, seeking their own power, have grossly mismanaged the nation’s affairs, and will continue to do so without action by responsible citizens. Dana Walsh is standing up to take action at this critical turning point in our nation’s political and economic history.
Dana is a citizen willing to retake the reigns from those who misuse power. Dana understands the significant issues of the day. The excessive tax burden, complicated government bureaucracy, and intrusive government regulation must be stopped. Why don’t most people see that we are heading toward socialism?” Dana believes that today’s state of political and constitutional affairs is not what the founding fathers had in mind. Members of Congress were supposed to serve their country as a “Citizen Statesmen,” and return shortly to private life. They were supposed to serve the interests of the citizens, not the interests of the government.
Unlike many great leaders before them, most of today’s Congress (especially Nancy Pelosi) put their own careers and interests, and the growth of government, ahead of the country’s best interests. This must stop! Dana launched her campaign to help right the country’s policy culture away from its present collectivist course and back toward our Founder’s constitutional vision of truly limited government. Like the Founders intended, Dana has no interest in staying in Congress forever or making a career out of it.
Dana considers the most important objective to be: stop Nancy and her liberal / socialist comrades from destroying the country’s prosperity.
- Douglas V. Gibbs
Share This!
Dana! Give “Queen Pelosi” the HELL that she has put California and the Nation through. I wish I could vote for you!
In Dana’s “The Case Against Nancy Pelosi - Part I”, she commented that she didn’t believe that Nancy read the Wall Street Journal and how economically inept Nancy seems to be.
I would surmise that Nancy probably doesn’t read the WSJ because she wouldn’t understand what she was reading for one, and for two it isn’t filled with the garbage she likes to hear. For that kind of information one needs to read the New York Times, which I’d bet she reads. Trouble is, few Americans read the NYTimes anymore. And that is why Nancy is so out of touch with the people.
She doesn’t understand that although the San Francisco district she’s in wouldn’t normally be thought of as the place I would normally fund, I consider it because the San Francisco district affects me in Virginia when it’s representatives vote for legislation that affects me in VA.
If the National representatives [note I didn’t say Federal] would stick to legislating based upon the US Consitution, my state of VA would be where I’d go for help with Health Care, trade issues, schools, homosexuality issues and the like - NOT the National government. So I’m very interested in how Dana is going to succeed against the terrible precedent in Washington to ignore the US Constitution when legislating? If I were part of the Washington team, I would simply vote NO on any legislation which is not meet Constitutional principles. I hope Dana, that you will give this strong consideration when you get elected.
Good luck on wiping out Nancy,
George Danz
Suffolk, VA